The Disclosure Foundation has sent a formal letter to the Executive Director of arXiv, requesting a review of the platform’s decision to reject two submissions from astrophysicist Dr. Beatriz Villarroel.
arXiv is a widely used open access preprint repository operated by Cornell University, where researchers share scholarly articles with the scientific community prior to journal publication. The platform plays an important role in modern scientific communication by making research accessible to scholars around the world.
Dr. Villarroel’s work examines unexplained astronomical transients and their potential correlations with historical observations, including studies of transient optical signatures identified in historical sky surveys. The papers at issue had already passed peer review at established scientific journals. However, the submissions were denied posting on the platform.
Procedural Concerns
Our concern is not about endorsing any particular conclusion reached in the research. Scientific progress depends on open debate and the ability of the research community to examine findings directly.
Instead, the issue raised in the letter relates to procedural consistency.
At the same time that Dr. Villarroel’s submissions were rejected, a critique of the papers was accepted and posted to arXiv. This created an unusual situation in which criticism of the research was made publicly available through the platform, while the underlying work itself remained inaccessible there.
The Disclosure Foundation believes this raises legitimate questions about how moderation standards were applied in this case.
Read The Letter
The full letter sent to arXiv outlines these concerns and respectfully requests that the platform reconsider its decision.
(Embedded letter from the Disclosure Foundation to arXiv Executive Director Dr. Gholamreza "Kami" Zabih)
(Embedded letter from the Disclosure Foundation to arXiv Executive Director Dr. Gholamreza "Kami" Zabih)
(Embedded letter from the Disclosure Foundation to arXiv Executive Director Dr. Gholamreza "Kami" Zabih)
Why This Matters
Platforms like arXiv have become central infrastructure for the global research community. They allow scholars to quickly disseminate findings, receive feedback, and ensure that research can be examined openly.
Maintaining trust in these systems requires that moderation policies be applied consistently and transparently, particularly when research touches on controversial or unexpected results.
Scientific history shows that ideas once considered unlikely or controversial have often proven valuable when examined carefully through open inquiry.
Ensuring that research can be evaluated on its merits by the broader scientific community helps preserve the integrity of that process.
Disclosure Foundation Position
The Disclosure Foundation supports rigorous inquiry, institutional accountability, and professional scientific discourse.
Our request to arXiv is straightforward: that the platform review the circumstances surrounding this moderation decision and apply its standards consistently so that peer-reviewed research can be examined openly by the scientific community.
We believe that open scientific dialogue remains essential to the advancement of knowledge, particularly in areas of research that may challenge existing assumptions.
